Investment Case Summary
- JPS bought at roughly 5x FY26e EBIT, the same multiple Tasmea paid for Maxim three weeks ago.
- Tier-1 LNG client book including Chevron, Woodside and Shell underwrites 80% of FY27 revenue visibility.
- Two parallel integrations inside a month is the execution risk the market should now price.
Three weeks after Maxim, a second 5x deal lands with Chevron, Woodside and Shell on the books
Tasmea (ASX:TEA) has done it again. Three weeks after announcing the A$254 million Maxim Group deal, the company has signed to acquire JPS Group for total consideration of up to A$75 million, with settlement targeted around 1 August 2026 subject to ACCC clearance.
The structure rhymes with Maxim. Upfront EV/EBIT of roughly 5x on FY26e underlying EBIT of approximately A$10 million, with A$50 million payable at completion (half cash, half scrip at A$8.50) and up to A$25 million in earn-out tied to JPS delivering A$12 million of Maintainable EBIT per year out to FY30.
Stack the two deals together and the story shifts. Tasmea now has pro forma FY26 underlying EBIT of A$185 million versus a standalone reconfirmed guide of A$117 million. The question is whether buying two specialist platforms at 5x EBIT inside a month is smart capital allocation or whether the market should worry about integration.
- Updated
- INSIDER CONVICTION TRADES FY26
The market hasn't noticed yet.
Disclosed by law. Missed by most investors. 129 trades tracked by us.
NO Credit card
- Director buys & sells tracked
- Buy / Hold / Sell verdict on every stock
- Technical analysis included
Why the Tier-1 LNG client book is the real asset here
JPS is small. Around 150 full-time staff, A$10 million of FY26e EBIT, founded in 2018. What it brings is the client list. Chevron, ConocoPhillips, INPEX, Mitsui, Santos, Shell and Woodside are all on the books, with more than 10 long-term Master Services Agreements underpinning the work.
That matters because LNG operations and maintenance is a sticky business. Initial specialist scopes routinely transition into ongoing asset support, and JPS already works across 15 Major Hazard Facilities with some sole-source arrangements. Revenue visibility is quoted at over 80% for FY27 and around 70% for FY28.
There is also the ValveTight Double Block and Bleed Saver isolation technology, where JPS is the sole Australian distributor under a 5+5 year deal. It lets clients do maintenance with plant still online, a niche specialist-margin offering with optional upside in the US and Africa.
The Maxim and JPS combination changes the segment mix
Before these two deals Tasmea was largely a Mining and Resources story with an emerging Electrical arm. Post-Maxim, the Electrical segment lifts to roughly A$100 million of EBIT with heavy data centre and rail exposure. Now JPS adds an Oil and Gas vertical anchored on the West Australian LNG complex.
Three structurally growing end markets, all bought at roughly the same 5x EBIT multiple, all with embedded recurring revenue. Pro forma net debt of around 0.85x FY26e EBITDA stays inside the 1.0x leverage ceiling.
Our concern is straightforward. Two specialist acquisitions inside a month is a lot of integration to ask of any management team, and Tasmea now needs to deliver on Maxim’s A$50 million Maintainable EBIT hurdle, JPS’s A$12 million hurdle and the standalone FY26 guidance all at once.
Why owner-led retention is the part to watch
All five founder-General Managers at JPS are staying on long-term contracts, taking A$25.6 million of TEA scrip and rolling into the LTI programme after the earn-out. Tasmea’s whole acquisition playbook depends on these owner-operators not walking out the door once their cheque clears.
The four-year earn-out and scrip lock-in is designed to prevent exactly that. The skeptical read is that two integrations running in parallel will test the corporate services platform in a way it has not been tested before.
The Investors Takeaway for Tasmea
Tasmea is now a roll-up of specialist trades businesses across Mining, Electrical, Data Centres and LNG, bought at single-digit EBIT multiples and funded inside the leverage cap. If both integrations deliver, FY27 pro forma earnings step up materially from today’s reconfirmed standalone guide.
If they slip, the market will mark the multiple down quickly because the story has shifted from organic compounding to programmatic M&A. Investors can read our prior take on the Maxim deal at stocksdownunder.
The FY26 result in August and the first JPS contribution numbers in the H1 FY27 print are the two checkpoints that will tell us whether this is the start of a re-rating or the moment integration math starts to bite.
