Does your company have an underperforming board? Here’s how to get rid of them: A s.249D notice!

Has your company got an underperforming board running your company and want to replace them? It’s possible and easy in theory, although difficult in practice.

Stocks Down Under recaps how you can remove underperforming board members.

How to remove an underperforming board

Simply put, shareholders wanting to remove an underperforming board (or individual directors) need to vote either at an AGM (Annual General Meeting) or an EGM (Extraordinary General Meeting).

Directors need to be re-elected by shareholders at AGMs, although their terms vary. This might be the perfect time to remove an underperforming board.

If you can’t wait for your company’s AGM, this can be done at an EGM. To hold an EGM, a company needs to be compelled by a so-called s.249D notice.

 

What is a s.249D notice?

A s.249D notice is so-called after the applicable section in the Corporations Act 2001.

It compels the directors of a company to call and arrange a general meeting on request of shareholders with at least 5% of votes.

Up until 2014, it was possible for 100 members to do so irrespective of the company. This loophole was abolished because it was realised that this would be a significantly small number in respect of large companies.

 

How can shareholders issue a s.249D notice?

The request has to be in writing, include the applicable resolution, be signed by all members making the request and be given to the company.

Directors must call the meeting within 21 says after the request is given and the meeting must be held no later than 2 months afterwards.

To be clear, this mechanism can be used for occasions other than when shareholders want to remove underperforming board members.

Although it is not a requirement under the act, shareholders seeking to remove an underperforming board or individual members should have replacements in mind.

This is especially the case in respect of smaller companies with smaller boards.

This is because they may be vulnerable to being suspended from trade for having less than the required number of directors (3 under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules).

 

Countering the company

Although the company will have to call an EGM and outline to shareholders that some want to remove members of the board, they will outline their case as to why the directors should not be removed.

Reasons may include that new board members will control too much of the company, the number of directors won’t be right with the company and the need for stability.

The company may try and rebut some of the specific reasons why shareholders want to remove the board members.

Existing board members will put this case to shareholders again at the meeting so it is important to have your own counter-arguments ready.

 

Recent case studies

One recent example occurred at TNG (ASX:TNG), which has since changed its name to Tivan.

It owns the Mount Peake Vanadium-Titanium-Iron project in Australia’s Northern Territory.

On this occasion, the board members that shareholders wanted to remove decided to resign before the vote went ahead.

Other board members resigned and a new board took over and resurrected plans to build a mineral processing plant at Darwin.

The previous board axed those plans after backlash from the local community and instead wanted to build the plant alongside the mine.

But the requisitioning shareholders (code speak for the shareholders that have called for a s.249D notice to remove the underperforming board) did another U-Turn.

 

Removing an underperforming board

Ultimately, it is difficult to remove an underperforming board given the requirement to get 5% of shareholders on your side.

If you disagree with the way a company is being run, it is far easier to just sell out of the company. But it is not impossible to stay and take action.

 

 

What are the Best ASX Stocks to invest in right now?

Check our buy/sell tips