SpaceX to Acquire xAI, Full Deal Summary

SpaceX xAI Takeover, The Full Story

SpaceX says it has acquired xAI, and the internal memo frames the combination as a vertically integrated innovation engine spanning rockets, satellites and communications, and AI.
The memo does not lay out full financial disclosure, but the reported valuation context is already eye-watering. Reuters reported the transaction as being valued around US$1.25 trillion, with SpaceX marked at about US$1.0 trillion and xAI at about US$250 billion. Bloomberg has also previously reported SpaceX around US$800 billion in the private market and xAI around US$230 billion in a recent raise, which gets you to broadly the same ballpark.

What are the Best ASX Stocks to invest in right now?

Check our buy/sell tips

If you are thinking ahead to public markets, this is where it gets interesting. Multiple outlets are now linking this consolidation to an expected SpaceX IPO in 2026, with Reuters reporting that SpaceX has been weighing a mid-June 2026 IPO and a potential valuation around US$1.5 trillion.
So yes, you can see how the investor hype machine spins up quickly. A scaled, narrative-heavy, founder-led compounder with real revenue and category dominance has historically been a magnet for public-market attention.

What we find most important is the strategic thesis Musk is putting on the table. The argument is that AI energy demand is going to outgrow what terrestrial data centers can sustainably supply, and that space-based infrastructure could eventually be the scaling path. That is the logic behind talking about orbit-based power generation and thermal advantages in space.

SpaceX is not alone in thinking about space infrastructure as a long-run compute and communications platform. The reporting explicitly frames the competitive landscape as intensifying, with large tech players and well-funded AI labs pushing hard on infrastructure and model scaling.

But this is also where execution reality matters. SpaceX’s ambitions here lean heavily on Starship as the step-change in lift capacity and cost curve, especially if the endgame is very large satellites or more complex orbital infrastructure. Starship is progressing through an aggressive test program, but it is still in development mode and iterating toward higher capability and cadence.
Then there is the risk stack, and it is not trivial.

This vision is massively capital intensive. You are talking about continued Starship development, next-gen satellite architecture, plus new categories of infrastructure that are closer to energy and data-center projects than traditional launch services. That naturally raises the question of funding strategy, and it explains why capital markets access becomes a core part of the story as soon as IPO talk gets real.

On the technical side, the challenge set expands fast. Hardware has to operate under radiation, communications links need to hold performance and reliability under harsh conditions, and any attempt to scale energy generation and cooling in orbit is an engineering program in its own right. Put differently, even if the long-run thesis is directionally right, the path is going to be defined by execution milestones and the cost of learning.