New Hope Corporation (ASX:NHC): Haters gonna hate, but this company is doubling down on coal nonetheless

New Hope Corporation (ASX:NHC) is going in a different (and arguably unfashionable) direction to the rest of the world’s energy majors. Namely, by betting bigger on coal.

The Queensland-based thermal coal producer is in the midst of its most ambitious expansion in decades, ramping up the long-delayed Stage 3 of its New Acland mine and targeting annual equity coal sales of around 13Mt by FY28, up from roughly 10.5 million in FY25. That represents a 24% uplift in output, engineered at a time when global coal demand is widely expected to be in structural decline and thermal coal prices remain under sustained pressure.

For New Hope, this is not a desperate gamble from a company in denial. It is a considered, patient bet rooted in seven decades of operating history, a clean balance sheet, and the quiet conviction that demand from Asia will outlast the optimistic timelines of the energy transition.

What are the Best ASX Stocks to invest in right now?

Check our buy/sell tips

New Hope Corporation (ASX:NHC): From An Ipswich Underground to Asian Export Giant

New Hope’s story begins in 1952 in Ipswich, Queensland, where the company commenced underground coal mining operations in the West Moreton coalfield, one of the oldest mining regions in the country. For its first two decades the company was a modest domestic producer, but the ownership landscape shifted decisively in the early 1970s when Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company (WHSP), alongside associated entities Farjoy and Domer Mining Co., acquired a controlling interest of around 60%. That relationship would prove to be one of the most enduring partnerships in Australian resources.

The 1980s marked New Hope’s international coming-of-age. In September 1980, the MV Floret sailed from Brisbane carrying 17,332 tonnes of Bundamba coal, becoming one of the first export shipments from the Ipswich region to test the Japanese market. It was a modest beginning, but it signalled a strategic pivot that would define the company for generations.

As export volumes grew, New Hope and TNT Shipping and Development formed a joint venture to build a dedicated coal terminal at the Port of Brisbane. Queensland Bulk Handling (QBH) was commissioned at Fisherman Islands in 1983, giving New Hope integrated control over its export supply chain from pit to port, a structural advantage that competitors would struggle to replicate. New Hope today owns QBH outright, and the facility handles up to 12Mt of coal per annum.

The company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange in September 2003, with Soul Patts initially retaining a 64% shareholding. Over the following two decades, that stake would gradually reduce to around 39% as New Hope expanded its shareholder base although Robert Millner’s dual chairmanship of both entities has ensured strategic alignment between the two has remained unusually tight.

That alignment paid off handsomely when Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. European nations scrambling to replace Russian energy supplies drove seaborne thermal coal prices to extraordinary heights, with the Newcastle benchmark briefly touching US$400p/t, a level few in the industry had ever imagined.

New Hope, with its low-cost production base already generating strong margins, suddenly found itself printing money. Dividends of $0.86 per share in FY22 and $0.70 per share in FY23 dwarfed the company’s five-year historical average of $0.23 per share, and special capital returns added further to shareholders’ windfall.

After the Spike: Building Through the Downturn

What separates New Hope from a company that merely rode a commodity super cycle is what it has done since. As thermal coal prices retreated from their war-induced highs, falling roughly 77% from their peak by 2025, New Hope used the intervening period to expand its production base rather than contract it.

FY25 full-year results, released in September 2025, underscored this strategy. Group saleable coal production reached 10.7Mt, up 18.1% on the prior year, with free-on-board cash costs falling 8.4% to $82.40 per tonne as scale economics kicked in. Underlying EBITDA came in at $765.8m and net profit after tax at $439.4m, figure that whilst lower than the Ukraine-era peaks, were remarkable for a company operating in a four-year low coal price environment. The board declared a fully franked final dividend of 15 cents per share.

The headline of FY25, however, was not the financial performance but the legal resolution that cleared the path for New Hope’s growth ambitions. The Oakey Coal Action Alliance — which had waged more than a decade of litigation against the New Acland Stage 3 expansion — abandoned its appeal, finally providing the regulatory certainty that had long frustrated management. Stage 3, once a perpetually deferred promise, is now a live construction and ramp-up story. New Hope has set a target of approximately 5Mt from New Acland, with a projected mine life of 12 to 15 years.

1H26: Back to reality

1H26 results, released yesterday, delivered a sobering but unsurprising reality check. New Hope’s Net profit after tax fell 84% to $54.3m, driven by a 20% decline in average realised coal prices to $139 per tonne year-on-year. But the operational story remained constructive: group coal production reached 5.5Mt for the half, with New Acland’s Stage 3 ramp continuing and the Bengalla Mine expected to recover to its 13.4Mt per annum run-of-mine production rate in the second half.

The company also confirmed that the Manning Vale West pit at New Acland, the third and most productive pit of Stage 3, is on track to begin mining activities in the final quarter of calendar year 2026, a milestone that will materially accelerate the path to full production. An interim dividend of 10 cents per share, fully franked, signals that the board is not in crisis mode despite the earnings compression.

Is the Growth Story Plausible?

The bull case for New Hope’s expansion rests on a set of structural arguments that the market has been slow to price, two of which stand above the rest. The first is supply-side discipline. ESG mandates have made it virtually impossible to finance new greenfield thermal coal mines through conventional capital markets; the result is a global industry where supply is quietly contracting even as legacy producers like New Hope invest in organic growth.

The second is demand resilience in Asia. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and increasingly India and Southeast Asia continue to rely on high-quality thermal coal for baseload power generation, and energy security concerns, amplified by the Ukraine shock, have made governments in those countries more cautious about accelerating coal phase-outs. New Hope’s coal, high in energy content and low in ash, commands a premium in these markets.

The bear case is equally compelling, however. Thermal coal prices have been under sustained pressure from oversupply dynamics and a broader global energy transition that, even if slower than activists hope, is real and directional. At $139 per tonne, New Hope is still generating positive margins — its breakeven is roughly US$60 per tonne at current exchange rates — but the headroom is considerably thinner than it was in 2022 or 2023.

There is also execution risk: New Acland Stage 3 has already been delayed for years, and ramping a new pit to full production while managing logistics, labour, and weather in southeast Queensland is a significant operational challenge. A prolonged period of coal prices below US$100 per tonne would test the economics of the expansion and the sustainability of the dividend.

The company’s position on the cost curve provides meaningful insulation. Operating in the lowest quartile of global production costs means New Hope is likely to be among the last thermal coal mines standing if demand does contract sharply, a dynamic that can paradoxically improve margins as higher-cost competitors exit the market. Morningstar, in its most recent assessment, anticipates equity coal sales reaching approximately 13Mt annually from around FY28, a figure consistent with management’s own trajectory and lending credibility to the 24% uplift target.

Conclusion: A Contrarian Bet With Teeth

New Hope Corporation is not for every investor, and it makes no pretence of being so. It is a pure-play thermal coal producer doubling down on an industry that much of the financial world has written off. But its 70-year operating history, integrated infrastructure, low-cost asset base, and the patient capital of Soul Pattinson as its anchor shareholder give it a durability that many of its detractors underestimate.

The 24% production uplift targeted by FY28 is not a fantasy. It is an engineering plan backed by approved mine permits, cleared legal hurdles, and two decades of operational experience at New Acland. Whether the coal price environment cooperates is another matter entirely, and that remains the dominant variable in any investment thesis on NHC.

What is clear is that New Hope is not waiting for the world to come around to its view. It is building the mine now, absorbing the cycle, and banking on Asian demand to reward its conviction. In a market crowded with companies racing toward net zero, that kind of stubborn, long-horizon conviction is either very brave or very smart, and the next few years will determine which.